On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:53:28 +0100 Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> I think it would be best to seek further sponsors for my proposal. > If you like my version, or would like to see it on the ballot, please > second it. Seconded > Here it is: > > > Formal proposal for amendment to Gunnar's GR: delete all, and replace > > with: > > > > Title: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private > > > > 1. The Debian Project regrets the non-implementation of the 2005 > > General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private list > > archives". That General Resolution is hereby repealed. > > > > 2. In case volunteers should come forward: Permission remains for the > > list archives (of any messages, whether posted before or after > > this resolution) to be declassified, provided that the > > declassification process is at least as respecting of the privacy > > of posters to debian-private as the process set out in the 2005 > > General Resolution. > > > > 3. Furthermore, the Debian listmasters remain empowered (subject to > > the usual consultation processes within the Debian project) to > > revise the rules governing the privacy and declassification of > > messages to -private. This includes making measures to make > > declassification more widely applicable, or easier to automate. > > > > 4. But, any weakening of the privacy expectations must not be > > retrospective: changes should apply only to messages posted after > > the rule change has come into force. > > > > 5. In particular, we reaffirm this rule: no part of a posting made to > > -private, which explicitly states that it should not be > > declassified, may be published (without its author's explicit > > consent). This rule may be changed by the listmasters (para.3, > > above), but only for future messages (para.4, above), and only > > following consultation, and only with ample notice. > > > > 5. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary. > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1 > > > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX4Vn5AAoJEOPjOSNItQ05vFgH/29lNK5S6bUo1mXZhau74UP5 > > 8PMCDwEUa7rcYuKefJH4wxvLxQM5FBL8kg72Y4gvr7unqE/sA5HIDsV0pC3EbLZN > > c2dwmSTrJcxcpST5GI5nfDrUoiP3Y4RMmeLOR97ugHYXxofzakn2XzWMFeoZfChC > > gu/gb09n6wNkPTvO5YBw2Ve/Soud5TUD1RehK+E2z1d2hvesekRG3k9cWVuxxoj7 > > ljfBpTuNpsnWzbItyhequ+U57tsyS92FWGgANzpQmO+GhhZpZlFImKlAJN4Vi0Dl > > jVrDD24EKjKOxIIMxU7448ciITXeTsnfTgylfX9zrzAKfwa7gWPnbWrGNF0E9us= > > =/vLH > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Thanks, > Ian. > > -- > Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. > > If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is > a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter. >
pgp6Oh9wEOD5D.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
