On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:15:05PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> === BEGIN GR TEXT ===
>
> Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private.
>
> 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
> lisa archives" is repealed.
> 2. In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debian
> Developers are strongly encouraged to use the debian-private mailing
> list only for discussions that should not be disclosed.
>
> === END GR TEXT ===
So to clarify the situation, I can find (signed) seconds from:
- Thibaut Paumard <thib...@debian.org>
- Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org>
- Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <o...@debian.org>
- Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org>
There is also an unsigned second from:
- Ondrej Sury <ond...@sury.org>
Then there is a proposal from Iain Lane <la...@debian.org>:
========================================================================
Title: debian-private shall remain private
1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of
debian-private list archives" is repealed.
2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the
debian-private archives, except when the authors of all material
being declassified have explicitly consented.
3. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.
========================================================================
Which is prefered by Steve M. Robbins <s...@debian.org>, and I'm
not sure I should count that as a second.
Then there is Ian Jackson's proposal with 2 seconds:
- Micha Lenk <mi...@debian.org>
- Gunnar Wolf <gw...@debian.org>
Did I miss something?
Kurt
