On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:04:00PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> [2016-07-16 20:52:03 +0200]: > > This is at least very confusing. The title says "will remain > > private", but none of the text says anything about it being > > private > > I agree that the current title is misleading, as it doesn't convey the wording > of the full proposal. > > I think that the title could be changed to someting along the lines of > "Acknowledge that the current debian-private declassification process will not > be implemented", but I think that's too long. Maybe "Revoke the current > debian-private declassification process"? > > I don't know if such a title change falls under A.1.6 or not, as the actual > meaning of the GR is the text, not its title, but the title might have misled > people into seconding. *shudder*
I suggest you at least change the title. I don't think that will alter the meaning. People can always object to this. Or do you intend to accept Don's proposal? Kurt
