Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members"):
> I'd find arguments of the form "I personally would find it confusing/bad
> to have both going on because ..." more compelling than arguments of
> the form "it would generally be confusing/bad." What I'm saying is that
> I'd be a lot more sympathetic to delay more than a week or so if people
> come forward and say they personally would like to delay more than if
> they say that some nebulous we/it would be a good idea to delay more.
Firstly, I realise that I have an obvious bias here.
But, speaking entirely personally: I would like to engage properly
with the discussion on the details of the maximum term limit. But I
don't have the energy for that right now. I need to limit the
proportion of my Debian effort that goes into politics, for my own
sanity if for no other reason.
So just to be entirely clear: you are completely entitled to push on
with this now, and I understand why you want to. But you did ask for
my personal opinion, and my preference would be to wait.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/21592.61352.932288.466...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
