On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:24:55PM -0500, Jordan Metzmeier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > > > > That does not sound to me as Fedora _only_ supporting systemd, or am I > > missing something? > > > > It looks like Fedora 20 still has a sysvinit package, but it won't > exist in the next release[1]. Upstart is also retired[2]. I would > consider the lack of available alternatives in their repo to be "only > supporting systemd". Fedora supports and will support sysvinit scripts. This does not mean that you can run sysvinit to start the system, but only that those scripts will be executed by systemd.
This is necessary for backwards compatibility and compatibility with 3rd party packages. Distribution packages have been almost all converted to systemd services, with a handful of less-used-packages remaining [1]. So yes, for all intents and purposes, Fedora only supports systemd (as PID 1). Zbyszek [1] $ repoquery -f '/etc/init.d/*' dircproxy-0:1.2.0-0.22.RC1.fc22.x86_64 snake-server-0:0.11.1-5.fc21.noarch ltsp-server-0:5.4.5-8.fc21.x86_64 conmux-0:0.0-22.493svn.fc22.noarch gofer-0:0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch powerman-0:2.3.5-9.fc22.i686 spawn-fcgi-0:1.6.3-8.fc22.x86_64 powerman-0:2.3.5-9.fc22.x86_64 ldirectord-0:3.9.5-12.fc22.2.x86_64 svxlink-server-1:0.13.1-14.fc22.x86_64 python-carbon-0:0.9.12-4.fc21.noarch ltsp-client-0:5.4.5-8.fc21.x86_64 ratbox-services-0:1.2.1-11.fc21.x86_64 cyphesis-0:0.6.2-3.fc22.x86_64 sslogger-slogd-0:0.96-13.fc22.x86_64 vhostmd-0:0.5-9.fc22.x86_64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141030215103.gp2...@in.waw.pl
