On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:09:18 -0700, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> said:
> Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> writes: >> Q2: support for alternative init systems as PID 1 >> ================================================= A2.1: packages MUST >> work with one alternative init system (in [iwj]) (if you are confused >> with “one” here, it’s basically fine to read it as “sysvinit” >> instead. See [10]this subthread for a discussion about this) > I believe Ian's intended reading is that a package that depends on > uselessd | systemd (but does not work with sysvinit) would be allowed > by his proposal. I would hope that this would not be allowed by Ian's proposal until uselessd is also in Debian. In particular, "work with one alternative init system", I think, *should* imply that the alternative init system is in Debian. Ian, as I understand your previous message, you were only addressing the issue of a non-sysvinit alternative init system, and not a not-in-Debian alternative init system, so can you clarify your intent regarding how your proposal would treat init systems that are not in Debian? -- Hubert Chathi <uho...@debian.org> -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87bnp2debu....@desiato.home.uhoreg.ca
