Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init
systems"):
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > 2. Loose coupling of init systems
> >
> > In general, software may not require a specific init system to be
> > pid 1. The exceptions to this are as follows:
>
> Could you change the formulation here?
>
> Several people seem to understand this as "must work with *all* init
> systems"; however as far as I understood from earlier discussions you
> only want to forbid depending on *one* specific init system, that is
> dependencies like init-A | init-B would still be allowed.
I think the language is already clear. But I will change `a' to
`one', so we have
`In general, software may not require one specific init system'
I don't want to further delay matters by making a bigger change which
I think would require consultation.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/21571.48767.326728.991...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
