Ian Jackson wrote:
> Joey Hess writes ("Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init
> systems"):
> > Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > The problem with making it simply not apply to jessie is that there
> > > would be a continued opportunity to create `facts on the ground' which
> > > make it difficult to disentangle things in jessie + 1.
> >
> > Can you please point to one thing in jessie that is currently entangled
> > in a way that your proposal would prevent happening?
>
> As far as I'm aware the current situation in jessie is fine as far as
> this GR goes.
[..]
> So if there is no backsliding, this GR will not delay the jessie
> release at all.But, the resolution of this GR and the start of the freeze cooincide, +-1 week. And after the freeze, the chances of backsliding being allowed, after release team review, are minimal. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
