On Friday 17 October 2014 06:27 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote: > On 17 October 2014 15:53, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <r...@researchut.com> wrote: >> > Why is SysV Init so unacceptable ? It is a neutral init that serves well >> > for all our sub-projects. Let that be the default choice. > Please do not conflate two very different issues. The default choice > has been decided and is not in question at this point. This is about > ensuring that SysV init (among others) is and continues to be a > *possible* choice for a user.
It would be nice to know what "possible" is defined as. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
