On 17/10/14 at 10:28 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > 2014-10-17 10:01 GMT+02:00 Lucas Nussbaum <lea...@debian.org>: > > So, I think that we need alternative proposal(s), [...] > > I agree with this point in principle, but we should avoid having too > many options, leading to scattered votes. One party could "win" with > less than 25% of the votes if the other ones are stealing votes one > another, especially if they're aiming at the same goal, but with > different statements.
Note that our voting method is clone-proof, so one proposal cannot steal votes from one another. That's one of the great things about Condorcet: you can have similar proposals on the same ballot without causing the votes to be split. Also numbers like "25%" don't really make sense with Condorcet, unless you limit the calculation to two proposals. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141017084245.ga9...@xanadu.blop.info
