Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> writes: > If this has not changed, is that something that the DPL candidates would > like to tackle ? (Bonus question to the DPL candidates: are you subscribed > to debian-private ?)
Private is like it always was (I am subscribed, and have been for every day of my DDship). Fortunately, modern mail clients can mark a whole thread read, so if the subject is not interesting, it's just a button away, and the whole thread disappears. And if I don't read it, it's not hard to keep that information private, whether it belonged to -private in the first place, or not. As such, whatever goes on on -private, it doesn't really bother me. The traffic is low enough to handle. (But then, I'm subscribed to -bugs-dist@ AND lkml, so my definition of low may not be shared by most.) Nevertheless, I have no intention of trying to change how -private@ is used. I could imagine ways to make it more useful, but I don't see the effort being worth the trouble. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8762087fi6....@galadriel.madhouse-project.org
