On 2013-03-14 17:10, MJ Ray wrote:
How much time do you think voters should spend reading these
discussions?
I really don't think that voters should feel obliged to read them at
all.
With the benefit of some hindsight, do you feel that you are being
concise enough to achieve that time?
I only expect people to read threads where they're interested in
candidates' answers to the questions, and therefore won't want them to
oversimplify answers to complex questions. So, yes.
Would you change anything about the DPL or GR processes to help
achieve that
time?
It's not something I've planned to try to change, but I think the
election process is probably still too long (at > 10% of the year),
despite
http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_004
More immediately, I do wonder if all the questions being asked here are
strictly ones that will help decide people's votes.
It appears to me that some DPLs^Wpeople may merely be asking questions
that they find interesting and would like to see discussed. While it's
nice to see these polite discussions of big issues for Debian, I would
suggest that some of them might be better started on the specific
relevant lists, with participation from more people than the DPL
election candidates!
--
Moray
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/89fc7844f7adbe3e42c7edb44d806...@www.morayallan.com
