Hi Moray, hi all, Le mardi, 12 mars 2013 21.24:15, Moray Allan a écrit : > In my view, if we want to lengthen the term of office for our > leadership roles, which could have beneficial aspects, we should do that > as part of a wider reform that reduces the concentration of roles/power > in a single person.
As I see it, one way to do that (which has certainly been proposed already)
would be to have a sort-of "DPL guild"⁰. It would have these properties¹:
- "enough" members
(start with 3 for example, but a fixed number set in the constitution)
- fixed-length terms ("18 months" for example)
- renewable terms
- overlapping terms (more by coincidence than by enforcement)
- resignation is possible per-member, at any time
(so if one member resigns, a new one is elected ASATCP²)
- leadership/chairman role (if needed) rotated between the elected members on
a regular basis³
What do the candidates think of such a system; would it be something you would
push, not push, why?
Thanks in advance, cheers,
OdyX
⁰ Team / Board / Committee / Whateva, the name isn't the core of the idea.
¹ Which are quite alike those of the swiss federal government
² As Soon As The Constitution Permits
³ Could also be done by decision of the "guild", for example; or not at all.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
