On Wed, Mar 31 2010, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> Now when we upgrade our policies and/or infrastructures, like what was
>>> recently proposed for sha1sums instead, this requires manual updating of
>>> all our packages for no good reason.
>>
>> That would be the naive way to implement things. And yes, that
>> would be sillly.
>>
>> I just update code in one place, test it, and then run a script
>> that does a git pull for all my packages. The next time I build the
>> package, it will pull in the change.
>
> Exactly there is the problem. If you'd use dh_md5sums, a binNMU would
> be all that is needed to update your packages (yes, I know that is not
> yet possible for arch:all, but I guess the time will come...). In your
> case we have to wait until you've decided to upload all of your
> packages...
In either case the final packges depend on someone changing the
code that generates the md5sum. /I/ do not have to wait around for
debheper to be changed, I can get my packages in when I upload the new
policy package, which has often happened in the past.
Do we have a concrete case of my packages seriously lagging
policy or debhelper?
manoj
--
The new Linux anthem will be "He's an idiot, but he's ok", as performed
byMonthy Python. You'd better start practicing. -- Linus Torvalds,
announcing another kernel patch
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
4096R/C5779A1C E37E 5EC5 2A01 DA25 AD20 05B6 CF48 9438 C577 9A1C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4ssxnlw....@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com
