On 19/03/10 at 22:57 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:36:53PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:44:23PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote: > > > Is there any legitimate reason that wanna-build access should be > > > restricted to any group smaller than the entirety of gid 800 > > > membership? > > > > There was. > [...snip history...] > > Of course, this bug has now been fixed: rather than using a libdb-based > > database, wanna-build is now running off a postgresql database. As such, > > it might be prudent to investigate whether giving regular developers > > read-access to that database could be doable (it might be difficult, > > given that wanna-build runs on a restricted host currently, or it might > > be simple; this is something for the wanna-build team to look into). But > > I don't think it's unfair to wait a while until all the issues have been > > dealt with before thinking about giving the developer body access to the > > database. > > It was pointed out to me on IRC by a member of the Debian sysadmin team > that this has in fact already happened: buildd.debian.org, aka > cimarosa.debian.org, is not a restricted host, and the wanna-build > database is not restricted; every DD is able to access the database.
Also, the public part (as in: not the security builds, for example) is imported into UDD (wannabuild table). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100320065537.ga2...@xanadu.blop.info
