On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:54:15PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sat May 02 00:52, Luk Claes wrote: > > It would be a clear indication that the foundation document should get an > > update or that the postition statement should get dropped again.
> I think Manoj's point is that if voting some option X (a position > statement in conflict with an FD) means that we have to vote to change > the FD or drop X, then why wasn't X a vote to change the FD in the first > place? Surely we don't need a vote just to then have another vote... No one has the authority to declare, a priori, for the entire project, that a given position statement is in conflict with a FD. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
