On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:54:43PM +0000, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan said: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:14:27PM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote: > > > On Mon Jan 12 22:07, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > I find this reasonable, in general, for minor issues. But it's worth > > > > noting > > > > that in this occasion, the developers didn't feel it was necessary to > > > > delegate > > > > this responsibility. If they did, they'd have voted for option 4. > > > > > > They did vote for option 4, through the wonders of condorcet. more than > > > half the voters were happy with that option (or it would not have beaten > > > FD) > > > > For a very specific and convenient definition of "happy". According to your > > definition, the developers endorsed both delegating and not delegating at > > the same time! > > > > I guess now you'll have a hard time explaining me what this means... > > Not at all. Option 1 was the only option that failed to meet simple > majority. Every other option on the ballot beat it by somewhere between > a factor of 2 and 3. That seems like a pretty clear vote that the > solution you are advocating is not what the project wants.
It seems as you're trying to vindicate option 4 by discrediting me by discrediting option 1. Basically: - Robert doesn't like option 4 - Robert voted for option 1 - Option 4 ranked above option 1 Therefore: - The project is endorsing option 4!! This doesn't make any sense. To begin with, my opinion is only a ridiculously small part of the vote results. > so I see > that you haven't accepted the outcome. Of course I have. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
