On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:14:08PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:03:45AM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote: > > On Sun Jan 11 10:56, Robert Millan wrote: > > > On the other hand, it appears that the Secretary, the DPL and the Release > > > Team > > > don't like that we made an exception ONLY for firmware. As per your > > > reply I > > > will assume you're also in that list. > > > > I will note there was a simple majority in favour of releasing Lenny > > with DFSG violations (take that as you will). > > Relative to... ?
I think you mean both option 3 and 4 ranked above FD. I read that as "I don't like these options, but if there's no choice, I prefer them over the ambiguity of not making any explicit decision". This is hardly the same as "simple majority in favour". -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
