* Thomas Bushnell BSG (t...@becket.net) [081228 23:56]: > On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 09:05 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > What this voting seems to show is that clearly a majority doesn't want to > > stop the release of Lenny. What it also shows however is that the mixing up > > of the other options on this ballot and the way the supermajority > > requirements were set is problematic, and probably supporters of any other > > option than 1 (and perhaps also except 6) can claim that they would've won > > if the majority requirements were set in a way they consider more > > appropriate.
> It is problematic? Are you saying that the 2/3 requirement for changes > to the foundation documents should not apply if a majority thinks > otherwise? I'm not convinced why e.g. resolution 4 needs a 3:1-majority requirement, even though I cannot really see a difference between further discussion and that variant. But we already had all of that prior and during the vote, no need to repeat it. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
