Hi, just so that I've said this here too:
On Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org>
wrote:
> > > If there is sufficient support, we could also scrap the current
> > > vote, change our ballot, add options to it, or something, and restart
> > > the vote, but that would need a strong grass roots support (I do not
> > > think the secretary has the power to do so).
>
> I support stopping this GR and starting all over, if this is
> possible.
>
> I won't repeat all the reasons why this GR is seen as problematic;
> they have been named at great length already. I just want to add that
> even if we finish this GR we won't have the questions solved since we
> will continue to discuss what the winning Choice #n actually means,
> and this won't do the project any good.
>
> > As far as I understand from reading the immense threads, most people
> > (me included) don't want more options in the ballot. We want separate
> > ballots for separate subjects.
>
> I agree on this point, and I think your proposal is a good starting
> point for a new start in general - thanks!
>
> [..]
>
> > I hope that you can take that into consideration.
+1
And so far I have yet not seen anyone claiming this is a good vote (so I
assume basically everybody will be happy with a restart ;-)
regards,
Holger
PS.: plus, I was deeply sadened to see Manojs resignation mail. Thank *you*
for all the fish!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
