On Wed, Dec 17 2008, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> The way that we achive such combinations using condorcet is to
>> propose such combinations as options intheir own right; and then have
>> people vote on the combination option along with simple options.
>
> Or do separate votes...
Separate votes on related proposals are widely open to gaming
the system.
>> There was no such proposal during the discussion period.
>
> It was your decision to make a single ballot out of these orthogonal
> issues, do not present the situation as being the proposers' fault.
It is not the proposers fault in any case; it is, if anything,
the responsibiulity of folks who wanted to vote on more than one option
at a time, even when it was clear that the ballot was the way it is
now.
Secondly, I have presented my arguments why these proposals are
all strongly related, and thus deserve to be on the same ballot for a
fair vote. I do not see any counter arguments here.
manoj
--
Suicide is the sincerest form of self-criticism. Donald Kaul
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
