* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [081217 01:11]: > This is where I have a strong disagreement with Manoj and apparently with > you. I don't think there's any justification in the constitution for > requiring a developer statement about the project's sense of the meaning > of the SC and the DFSG to have a 3:1 majority, or to make a developer > override to enforce that sense of the meaning. > > Both the override and the statement about the meaning of the documents > should require 1:1. 3:1 should only be required when the documents are > explicitly superseded or changed, not just for making a project statement > about their interpretation.
I don't think that overriding can be done with 1:1-majority, but has the same requirements as changing. With the rest I however agree. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
