On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 04:27:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > >This is where I have a strong disagreement with Manoj and apparently with >you. I don't think there's any justification in the constitution for >requiring a developer statement about the project's sense of the meaning >of the SC and the DFSG to have a 3:1 majority, or to make a developer >override to enforce that sense of the meaning. > >Both the override and the statement about the meaning of the documents >should require 1:1. 3:1 should only be required when the documents are >explicitly superseded or changed, not just for making a project statement >about their interpretation.
And that's my interpretation too. I think the constitution is quite clear here. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com You lock the door And throw away the key There's someone in my head but it's not me -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
