----- "Steve Langasek" <vor...@debian.org> wrote:

> Boycotting is unlikely to prevent all ballot options from reaching the
> quorum requirements, and given the inconsistent application of supermajority
> requirements by the secretary it is possible that the vote outcome, as
> determined by the secretary, will not match what the outcome would have been
> on the same ballot with consistent supermajority requirements.

I don't see how he is being inconsistent. Honoring DFSG requirement that 
programs come with source shouldn't require a super-majority and neither should 
distributing GPL blobs if they are indeed GPL. All the other options require 
that we distribute software that is not DFSG compliant.

I know that some are fixated on the fact that firmware runs on "some other CPU" 
but I don't buy that line of reasoning. If this firmware business passes then I 
am going to start hunting down some MAME ROMs that have lapsed into the public 
domain. Those ROMs, after all, are firmware for video game machines and they 
run on a simulated CPU... not the "host".

I hope #1 wins and we release Lenny by distributing a proprietary firmware 
enabled installer out of "non-free". Its just as easy for users to download and 
it doesn't require us breaking our foundational documents or distorting the 
notion of what constitutes free software.

-- 
Ean Schuessler, CTO Brainfood.com
e...@brainfood.com - http://www.brainfood.com - 214-720-0700 x 315


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to