Adeodato Simó <d...@net.com.org.es> wrote: Hi,
>> I explicitly did not include a ballot suggestion in my post, so please >> don't put words in my mouth :) > > Sorry, honest mistake. I intended to put a "paraphrased" laben on those > brackets, but I forgot, I'm sorry. No problem, but you got your "paraphrasing" wrong, too. I did not write the "sensible" options needed to be ranked equally *and* first, only that they needed to be ranked equally. Ie voting sensible options/FD/zealot options or FD/sensible options/zealot options I'm emphasizing this now, because voting FD first and everyting else ranked equally below FD doesn't help (that's 2222221); sensible options need to be ranked higher. I wrote my post carefully because my intent wass not to tell people what they needed to vote, but to highlight *how* (and not *what*) to vote. I felt that given the complexity of this vote, it was important to highlight that, if only to get people to carefully look at how the vote works. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jbla...@debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
