Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>         The release team is free to interpret the SC and decide there is
>  no violation there (as long as they have a rationale, defensible
>  position, etc). That would not violate the constitution.
My understanding is that that's exactly what they did, and that's what my
post was trying to say.  That would make FD mean N-N-R-N-N, yes?

(This is probably confused by the fact that the release team has several
members who seem to have reached the same conclusion for different
reasons.)

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to