Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The release team is free to interpret the SC and decide there is > no violation there (as long as they have a rationale, defensible > position, etc). That would not violate the constitution.
My understanding is that that's exactly what they did, and that's what my post was trying to say. That would make FD mean N-N-R-N-N, yes? (This is probably confused by the fact that the release team has several members who seem to have reached the same conclusion for different reasons.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]