On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:42:19AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I do not think throwing options out because they are not of a > narrow and limited scope is right. The proposer and sponsors can > withdraw them, if they think the scope is too broad for the problem at > hand. No one else should be removing them from consideration as a > solution to the Lenny issue.
The proposers and sponsors of option 5 didn't propose this as an amendment to the current GR. Why should they have to *withdraw* the proposal in order to get it considered separately at a later time? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
