On Fri, Oct 31 2008, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I find it mildly entertaining that this vote did not take place > because apparently it takes "a couple of days, [...] and sometimes > longer" [0] to set up an "immediate" vote. I'm sure there were > very good reasons [1] to not rush things in this particular case. > > [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00203.html > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00226.html Mind you, I am not runing this vote anyway. So the fact i consider it useless, no-op, anti-ganneff vote, which serves no purpose whatsoever, except to kill any motivation ganneff might have had to facilitate admission of non-packagers into Debian, has absolutely nothing to say about what the person running this vote thinks about it. manoj -- What do you have when you have six lawyers buried up to their necks in sand? Not enough sand. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
