On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:49:33PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:23:37PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:28:43PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > > > > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > a1ea0fab-9ff7-4466-a951-99c712df8192 > > > [ ] Choice 1: Decision on membership reform stands until GR decided > > > [ ] Choice 2: Decision on membership reform delayed until GR decided > > > [ ] Choice 3: Further discussion > > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > What does "Further discussion" mean in the context of this vote? I think > > there should be no "Further discussion" on the ballot, as it is not clear > > what would happen if "Further discussion" wins. Would the decision still > > be suspended or not? > > > > If Further discussion wins, the decision remains delayed[0]. I thought > about removing it, but it's inclusion serves as a 'I abstain' or a 'I > think this vote is rubbish' or similar. > I can either drop it, or include a bit of text in the ballot about what > outcomes mean if you like. > > Neil > > [0] It's delayed at the moment. This is a vote to override that > essentially.
So what is the difference between 2 and 3? In case of 2 we already agree to have an other GR? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
