On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 09:43:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 05:43:47 -0400, Mike O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > I saw multiple people suggesting such limits. I did NOT see anyone > > propose a reason for such a limit other than you who seemed to be > > concluding that the reason for a limit was the speed at which people > > were performing their job. I was just proposing an alternate reason > > to yours. If the proposers of such limits had stated that they think > > it would aid in the speed at which things got done, they eluded me. > > That is not quite right. I have not presumed to know what > reasons other people might have had for limits, nor did I propose a > rationale for limits; I have merely expressed my opinion about one > cause for the deficiencies in the tech ctte's performance. I have > suggested that this cause (lack of time pr participation) has an > observable metric, and that metric could be used to aid decisions about > the composition of the cotte, rather than just setting some arbitrary > limits.
well you clearly stated that you thought the proposal to limit the number of hats was silly "Because the number of hats does not seem to be a good predictor for performance..." I was just trying to suggest this is not the only reason that one might want to suggest such a limit. You seem to agree that my reason sounds valid, so I guess your previous reason for thinking it to be a silly proposal is no longer relevant, so we can drop it... > > > Are you implying that my hypothetical shouldn't be advanced here? > > Having seen no concrete rationale, I have no idea whether your > hypothetical has any value or not. Did I not invite you tpo present any > supporting arguments? You did not. You invited me to present a well thought out proposal that I was ready to defend publicly instead of just a hypothetical, which seemed to make me think that you didn't think I should be advancing any such hypothetical until I had such a proposal. Which i don't have. Sorry if I misinterpreted your intentions. stew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
