Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we're voting for the proposal on the basis that all it creates is a > governance structure and everything else will be at the discretion of the > people involved, the proposal should *say* that rather than laying out a > bunch of initial policy. It instead lays out a lot of detailed procedure > which contradicts many of the proposals mentioned on this thread and does > not imply that's all going to change drastically as soon as the proposal > is adopted.
If that is the problem of the current GR, I wonder why nobody has come up to write (and others to second) an admentment which changes the initial starting policy. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
