On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote: > Okay, here's a new draft with the following changes: [...]
Okay, as per A.2 I'm calling for a vote on this. TTBOMK there aren't any related proposals or amendments to add to the ballot, so it should take the form: [ ] Choice 1: Endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers [ ] Choice 2: Further discussion A WML page for vote_003.wml is attached, that I hope is suitable. (As per A.1(6) I've fixed a couple of typos that were noted by Anibal and Steve, and reformatted the proposal in HTML) Cheers, aj
<define-tag pagetitle>General Resolution: Endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers</define-tag>
<define-tag status>D</define-tag>
# meanings of the <status> tag:
# P: proposed
# D: discussed
# V: voted on
# F: finished
# O: other (or just write anything else)
#use wml::debian::template title="<pagetitle>" BARETITLE="true" NOHEADER="true"
#use wml::debian::toc
#use wml::debian::votebar
<h1><pagetitle></h1>
<toc-display/>
# The Tags beginning with v are will become H3 headings and are defined in
# english/template/debian/votebar.wml
# all possible Tags:
# vdate, vtimeline, vnominations, vdebate, vplatforms,
# Proposers
# vproposer, vproposera, vproposerb, vproposerc, vproposerd,
# vproposere, vproposerf
# Seconds
# vseconds, vsecondsa, vsecondsb, vsecondsc, vsecondsd, vsecondse,
# vsecondsf, vopposition
# vtext, vtextb, vtextc, vtextd, vtexte, vtextf
# vchoices
# vamendments, vamendmentproposer, vamendmentseconds, vamendmenttext
# vproceedings, vmajorityreq, vstatistics, vquorum, vmindiscuss,
# vballot, vforum, voutcome
<vtimeline />
<table class="vote">
<tr>
<th>Proposal and amendment</th>
<td>Thursday, 21<sup>st</sup> June, 2007</td>
<td>Wednesday, 27<sup>th</sup> June, 2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Discussion Period:</th>
<td>Wednesday, 27<sup>th</sup> June, 2007</td>
<td>Saturday, 21<sup>st</sup> July, 2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Voting Period</th>
<td>Sunday, 22<sup>nd</sup> July, 00:00:00 UTC, 2007</td>
<td>Sunday, 5<sup>th</sup> August, 00:00:00 UTC, 2007</td>
</tr>
</table>
<vproposer />
<p>
Anthony Towns
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
[<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2007/06/msg00199.html";><[EMAIL PROTECTED]></a>]
</p>
<vseconds />
<ol>
<li> Martin F. Krafft
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
<li> Neil McGovern
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
<li> Moritz Muelenhoff
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
<li> Steve Langasek
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
<li> Raphael Hertzog
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
<li> Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
<li> Guilherme de S. Pastore
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
<li> Enrico Zini
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
<li> Alexander Schmehl
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
<li> Anibal Mosalve Salazar
[<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>]
</li>
</ol>
<vtext />
<p> Choice 1.
The actual text of the resolution is as follows. Please note
that this does not include supporting or opposing arguments
or rationales. These may be found on the debian-vote mailing
list archives.
</p>
<h2>General Resolution: Endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers</h2>
<p>The Debian Project endorses the concept of "Debian Maintainers"
with limited access, and resolves that:</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>A new keyring will be created, called the "Debian maintainers
keyring". It will be initially maintained by:</p>
<ul>
<li> Anthony Towns (proposer, ftpmaster, jetring developer) </li>
<li> Joey Hess (jetring developer) </li>
</ul>
<p>Commit access will also be provided to others in Debian with
similar roles to ensure that any problems relating to this keyring can
be dealt with by multiple people. These people will initially be:</p>
<ul>
<li> Brian Nelson (n-m frontdesk)
<li> Christoph Berg (n-m frontdesk, jetring developer)
<li> James Troup (DAM, ftpmaster, keyring-maint)
<li> Joerg Jaspert (DAM)
<li> Marc Brockschmidt (n-m frontdesk)
<li> Michael Beattie (keyring-maint)
<li> Ryan Murray (ftpmaster)
</ul>
<p>The keyring will be handled using suitable technology to ensure
it can be maintained by a team. It is expected it will initially be
maintained in alioth subversion using the jetring tool, and that
the keyring will be packaged for Debian and regularly uploaded
to unstable.</p>
<p>The team will be known as the Debian Maintainer Keyring
team. Changes to the team may be made by the DPL under the normal
rules for delegations.</p>
</li>
<ol>
<li>
<p>The initial policy for an individual to be included in the keyring
will be:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>that the applicant acknowledges Debian's social contract,
free software guidelines, and machine usage policies.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>that the applicant provides a valid gpg key, signed by a Debian
developer (and preferably connected to the web of trust by multiple
paths).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>that at least one Debian developer (preferably more) is willing
to advocate the applicant's inclusion, in particular that the
applicant is technically competent and good to work with.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>All additions to the keyring will be publicly announced to the
debian-project list.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The initial policy is that removals from the keyring will occur
under any of the following circumstances:</p>
<ul>
<li> the individual has become a Debian developer </li>
<li> the individual has not annually reconfirmed their interest </li>
<li> multiple Debian developers have requested the individual's
removal for good reason, such as problematic uploads, unfixed
bugs, or being unreasonably difficult to work with </li>
<li> the Debian Account Managers have requested the removal </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>The initial policy for Debian developers who wish to advocate a
potential Debian maintainer will be:</p>
<ul>
<li> <p> Developers should take care whom they choose to advocate,
particularly if they have not successfully participated as an
Application Manager, or in other mentoring roles. Advocacy should
only come after seeing the individual working effectively within
Debian, both technically and socially.</p> </li>
<li> <p> Advocacy messages should be posted to debian-newmaint
or other relevant public mailing list, and a link to that mail
provided with the application.</p> </li>
<li> <p> If a developer repeatedly advocates individuals who
cause problems and need to be removed, the Debian Maintainer
Keyring team may stop accepting advocacy from that developer. If
the advocacy appears to be malicious or particularly careless,
the Debian Account Managers may consider removing that developer
from the project.</p> </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>The initial policy for the use of the Debian Maintainer keyring with the
Debian archive will be to accept uploads signed by a key in that keyring
provided:</p>
<ul>
<li> none of the uploaded packages are NEW </li>
<li> the Maintainer: field of the uploaded .changes file corresponds
with the owner of the key used (ie, non-developer maintainers may
not sponsor uploads) </li>
<li> none of the packages are being taken over from other source
packages </li>
<li> the most recent version of the package uploaded to unstable
or experimental includes the field "DM-Upload-Allowed: yes" in
the source section of its control file </li>
<li> the most recent version of the package uploaded to unstable
or experimental lists the uploader in the Maintainer: or Uploaders:
fields (ie, non-developer maintainers cannot NMU or hijack packages) </li>
<li> the usual checks applied to uploads from Debian developers pass </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>The initial relationship to the existing new-maintainer (n-m)
procedure will be as an independent means of contributing to
Debian. This means, among other things, that:</p>
<ul>
<li> Applicants in the n-m queue may choose to apply to be a Debian
maintainer while finishing their application or waiting for it to
be accepted. </li>
<li> Individuals may apply to the n-m process, and pass through
it without becoming a Debian maintainer at any point. </li>
<li> Individuals may apply to become a Debian Maintainer without
being in the n-m queue, or having any intention of joining the
n-m queue. </li>
<li> Application Managers may advocate their n-m applicants but
are not required to. They may decide to only advocate applicants
who have passed some (or all) of the T&S or P&P checks. </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>There is no initial policy or plans for use of the keyring outside
the archive. Individuals who wish to reuse the keyring for granting
access to services to some or all Debian Maintainers may do so
according to their own judgement, of course.</p>
<p>In particular, this means that Debian maintainers do not participate
in the general resolution procedure defined in the Debian constitution,
and cannot vote in Debian elections.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<vquorum />
<p>
With the current list of <a href="vote_003_quorum.log">voting
developers</a>, we have:
</p>
<pre>
#include 'vote_003_quorum.txt'
</pre>
#include 'vote_003_quorum.src'
<vstatistics />
<p>
For this GR, as always
<a href="suppl_003_stats">statistics</a>
shall be gathered about ballots received and acknowledgements
sent periodically during the voting period. Additionally, the
list of
<a href="vote_003_voters.txt">voters</a>
would be made publicly available. Also, the
<a href="vote_002_tally.txt">tally sheet</a>
may also be viewed after to voting is done (Note that
while the vote is in progress it is a dummy tally sheet).
</p>
<vmajorityreq />
<p>
The proposal needs simple majority.
</p>
#include 'vote_003_majority.src'
<voutcome />
#include 'vote_003_results.src'
<hrline>
<address>
<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Manoj Srivastava</a>
</address>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
