Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I second the following proposal (by my count it is still missing at > least two seconds, if anybody is interested in seconding).
How can anyone second that in its current state? It's rather buggy. I like the idea, but please withdraw your seconds until the worst bugs are fixed. If that passes as-is, the project will look sillier. Look at the first phrase for an example of the litter: > The Debian Project endorses the concept of "Debian Maintainers" with > limited access, and resolves to > > 1) A new keyring will be created [...] ...resolves to a new keyring will be created? 8-S I think it's rather disppointing that the OP hasn't accepted any of the amendments I previously posted in http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2007/06/msg00073.html Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
