Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, how about we settle this once and for all? The DFSG is not an > orthogonal basis for a vector space. The world won't end if we add a new > point to it that some folks feel is redundant with what it already says. > If there's a principle that we're generally applying for licenses, let's > just add it to the DFSG so that it's present in clear and unambiguous > language and everyone knows what the project's position as a whole is.
I am in favor of this. Having participated in the original discussion that led to the DFSG, I do not believe that it was intended to be a perfect, never-changing document. I believe that clarifying answers to questions that have proven problematic in the past is a positive step for Debian and the DFSG. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
