On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:22:55AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 04 March 2007 22:43, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Questions raised in the discussion period that are relevant to the GR. > > This summary is all very nice, but IMHO does not reflect what this GR is > about. > ... > > What this GR is about that the DDs who originally started this creative > solution, together with a group who have long been discontent with the > FTP-masters are now trying to prevent the FTP-masters from doing their job: > guarding the quality of the archive. > ... > > As I personally feel that this GR is a misplaced attempt from the > disgruntled DDs to get their way, I have voted for "further discussion".
I drafted and submitted this GR alone (with little internet access at the time). I won't prejudge of the motivation of each seconders, but as far as I am concerned the motivations I gave in the summary were accurate. I take offense that you are implying this is not the case, and that I am somehow part of some "disgruntled DDs" cabal with an agenda. This is just your conspiracy theory. To the voters: -------------- I posted this summaries because some undecided developers asked me for a summary in order to vote. I should probably have abstained to do that especially since I drafted the GR this way to avoid tangential discussions. Apologies, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
