On Wed, Feb 28, 2007, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > As far as I can tell, it is not forbidden. A DAM can run for DPL and > still retain the DAM hat if elected. Again, this makes sense, as the > fact that the DAM is in the race would be well known and therefore a > vote to elect them would be an expressed consent to combining these > hats.
Except in the corner case of a fast appointment within the two weeks between the end of the election and the beginning of the new term. > What is forbidden is to combine the hats of DAM and DPL without an > explicit vote by the developership. This sounds like a good rationale. From now on I will interpret the policy this way. Regards, -- Sam.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
