Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:13:00AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: >> Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 08:17:17AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: >> >> Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:18:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:17:05 +0100, Ian Jackson >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> >> > Perhaps it would be better if the policy maintainer were someone who >> >> >> > was more willing to listen and take on board comments ? >> >> >> This sounds like a canard. What official Board comments have >> >> >> been disregarded by the current set of policy maintainers? Or do you >> >> >> mean "Ian wants a Yes Man"? >> >> > Ian meant "take comments under consideration", not "listen to comments >> >> > from the technical committee". >> >> Manoj sometimes gives the impression of not listening [...] >> > Err, I mean Ian meant "(take on board) (comments)", and Manoj appears to >> > have misinterpreted that as "(take on) (Board comments)". Nothing more. >> I'm not familiar with the expression "take on board", but according to >> dict.leo.org you are still asserting that he does not take into >> consideration comments by others. I repeat what I wrote: > > I'm asserting nothing of the kind. Ian might be, but I'm not.
Sorry, I was confused because you answered as if you could read Ian's mind, so I must have concluded you were the same person. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
