On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:35:48AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Make sure you have read the proposal in detail.
A little plea for the next GR discussion season: when people discuss a GR, please keep in mind that the discussion will become material that people would like to read before deciding what to vote. http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_004 says: Please note that this does not include preludes, prologues, any preambles to the resolution, post-ambles to the resolution, abstracts, fore-words, after-words, rationales, supporting documents, opinion polls, arguments for and against, and any of the other important material you will find on the mailing list archives. Please read the debian-vote mailing list archives for details. I do not have time nor motivation to go through the huge debian-vote mailing list archives of the last month. It would be useful if the main proponents of either result would work together (offline? on the wiki?) on a single short text that would summarise both positions in a way that they both think is fair. A few suggestions for trying to have a better list archive next time can found in http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ , and more specifically in http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ch02.html Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
