On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:20:52PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 26 septembre 2006 à 15:04 +0200, Frank Küster a écrit : > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > B) we do a single ballot : > > > > > > [ ] non-free firmware belong in non-free (don) > > > [ ] non-free firmware can be accepted in main (josselin) (needs 3:1) > > This is not what the proposal is about. The proposal stating this was > Steve's one, and it was rescinded.
Sorry, please propose a better one-line summary for the ballot then. > > > [ ] make an exception for etch (frederik) > > > [ ] further discussion > > > > For me, this is orthogonal. I want both 1 and 3 to be accepted, and 2 > > to be rejected. However, if I could only choose between 1 and 2, I'd > > would have to vote 2 over 1, since releasing etch is my priority. Err, > > free software is my priority, too - I wouldn't have a proper choice > > except rating both below "further discussion". > > If you want firmwares to be accepted for etch and not after, you vote 3, > full stop. 1 is only reaffirming the current situation, implying a delay > in the release. Indeed, which mean we could just as well drop 1, but is this clear for everyone ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
