Hi,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:21:12 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This issue remains, and it is still not solved. This has got the
> approval of Steve Langasek (who said that his proposal and this
> where orthogonal and a separate GR), of our DPL, who said he would
> postpone his own GR proposal for post etch, as well as the proposer
> of this GR.
> There also is clearly no amendment proposal of this GR, only of the
> various and numerous other GR proposals out there, and it is clear
> now that we either have to have a period of calm and reflection
> before going ahead, which is better done once etch is released, or
> sit back and see various well-thinking DDs filibustering the vote
> process upto irrelevance.
Have there been seconds for this proposal that I have missed?
And, as to timing, I think that the usual minimal discussion and
voting period applies, unless the DPL intervenes, of course.
manoj
--
"A dirty mind is a joy forever." Randy Kunkee
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
