Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >No, prove that you would otherwise support a similar amendment. > I am not sure how this can be done. [...]
By putting one forward, for example. Actions, not hollow promises. After all, my proposal is essentially "a new archive section different from main, contrib or non-free which will be considered part of Debian and distributed on our CD and netboot images. Then the people who use proprietary firmwares in their computers but cannot stand the idea of having some on their CDs will be able to easily create their own media." (from http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/09/msg00010.html) But now there's a new extra requirement that it does something that the original proposal ("fully support" according to http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/08/msg00098.html) won't do. So, please prove those statements are not hollow promises. Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
