On Sep 06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >That doesnt make a good reputation, setting something central like the > > >Social Contract and then randomly changing it back because its ohhh, so > > >hard to follow that change. > > We followed the SC pretty well until it was changed. Admitting that > > the change was not appropriate would be an act of honesty. > And voted a first time with 3:1 supermajority to change it, followed by a 3:1 > vote to confirm those changes. This still does not make it a good idea.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
