Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Following the social contract change, we have been able to remove most > of non-free stuff from the distribution, especially documentation. It > wasn't easy and we couldn't make it in time for sarge, but we can make > it in time for etch. For etch, we have the remaining firmware issue. And > just because we can't meet our expectations for firmwares, we should > abandon them all?
For me the key question is whether the d-i team is actually doing the work or not. Are they? If the answer is "yes", then I might vote for a delay. If the answer is "no", then I see no reason that a delay will change things. > First, it is a fact that we are going to release etch with non-free > firmwares. There is no decision to make here, it is too late. Those > polls are only a means to legitimate this fact in a political way, by > making it looking as a decision. Really? I'm flabbergasted. So I can just put whatever nonfree code I want into a package, and boom, it gets into etch? Because our principles do not control our actions? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
