Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It seems to me that this GR is unacceptable in this form because it >> does not give an adequate definition of firmware, and people seem to >> mean many different things by it. > > Well, in this case, firmware is clearly the firmware blobs actually into the > kernel without sources. This GR speaks only about the linux kernel, and is > not really generic like Steve's, and clearly mentions earlier the firmware as > being either program or register dumps.
So how do I know whether something is "firmware" instead of just ordinary sourceless code? Or is this supposed to be a blanket exemption for any non-source code in the kernel, of whatever sort? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
