On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:08:33 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> OTOH, the source may require a non-free tool to render it into a
> binary firmware form. If you don't have that tool, and maybe even
> no hope of getting access to it, is it any longer evident that the
> source is more useful than the binary for derived works?
But if you, as a user, do have such tools, then having the
sources around is a freedom that could be important for you. So that
software, if it shipped with source, will give some additional
freedoms, perhaps to only a subset of our users. One should not that
the freedom granted to some users does not detract from the freedom
of other users.
manoj
--
Every man is as God made him, ay, and often worse. Miguel de Cervantes
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
