On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:08:08 -0600, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj wrote: >> Actually, I disagree, and, even worse, so does the common >> definition of the phrase computer program: asking google about >> define: computer program gives: ,---- | * A computer program is a >> set of statements or instructions to be | used directly or >> indirectly in a computer in order to bring | about a certain >> result. >> | >> www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/matters/matters-9710.html > But Debian has a tradition of ignoring the common definition of > phrases. Have you tried asking google to define software, for > example? Yes. There the answer is not so clear cut: I get # Programs, procedures, rules, and any associated documentation # pertaining to the operation of a system. Contrast with hardware # (page ***). publib16.boulder.ibm.com/doc_link/en_US/a_doc_lib/aixins/insgdrf/glossary.htm # Generally, programs loaded into a computer from external mass # storage but also extended to include operating systems and # documentation. www.flw.com/define_s.htm as well as: # Coded instructions (programs) that make a computer do useful work. www.krollontrack.com/legalresources/glossary.asp # The programs that tell the computer what to do. www.esls.lib.wi.us/glossary.html So, there is clearly a lack of uniform consensus there; and when it was brought to our notice, we used an editorial change to the foundation documents to disambiguate; why are we not doing the same now? manoj -- I don't wanna argue, and I don't wanna fight, But there will definitely be a party tonight... Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]