Le mer 23 août 2006 13:35, Anthony Towns a écrit : > The followup was only intended to make sure it was clear that it *was* > Peter's take, and not necessarily the project's, and that debate is > still appropriate.
d-vote@ is a discussion list, and nothing here that isn't a vote result can be taken as a project statement. And Peter didn't worded his mail as claiming to be representative of the debian project either. Peter even did not said the debate was inapropriate, he was defining what he thing beeing a boundary to it. PS: that mail is not an offician statement from the debian project. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpL29CHXzADl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
