Hi Manoj! You wrote:
> + Traditionally, SPI was the sole organization authorized to hold > + property and monies for the Debian Project. SPI was created in > + the U.S. to hold money in trust there. I'm wondering about this part. It seems to me like just a historic overview of the old situation, which IMO does not belong in the constitution. > SPI and Debian are separate organisations who share some > goals. Debian is grateful for the legal support framework offered > by SPI. Debian's Developers are eligible for contributing > membership in SPI by virtue of their status as Developers. I don't think it makes sense that the Debian constitution determines who can become a member of SPI. That is something that should be (and probably is) described in SPI's bylaws. -- Kind regards, +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | |----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
