On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 18:51 +0100, David Pashley wrote: > Presumably because transfering money between countries involves > non-neglegable cost, where as transfer of ownership of hardware > doesn't[0].
I understand that - my point is that I don't see a clear reason to *disallow* other of such "vetted" organisations to own property for Debian, and hence wonder what good such an extra restriction would bring. I'd only add restrictions when there's a good reason for it. Just like with software :) Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
