On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:19:19AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:12:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:59:30PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:10:29PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > > > > > Feb 6th, Joey mails indicating he'd like to release the update > > > > > > at the end of Feb (27th/28th) or a little bit later at > > > > > > the end of February. "let me know if this is ok for > > > > > > you - or if this is not ok for you" > > > > > I note that it took you 16 days to reply, > > > > It wasn't a reply to Joey's mail, which I hadn't thought had needed a > > > > reply. > > > <expletive>. You have even _QUOTED_ the direct question asked by Joey. > > > Will you think questions as "not needing a reply" as a DPL as well?
> > Like I said, I didn't think it needed a reply. > Am I the only one who sees this as a misconception of epic proportions? Living in a world where one unanswered mail is "epic" must be very exciting for you. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
